Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Feminist text for your bookshelf

The latest edition of The Big Issue (its 300th edition) had the following article in it, written by your favourite feminist. Because I am notoriously bad at sticking to word limits, it was edited down slightly. Following is the article in its original form. I strongly urge everyone to pick up a copy of Emily Maguire's book (the subject of the article). It is brilliant.

-------------

When CLEO's annual 50 Most Eligible Bachelor list was revealed in late February this year, it managed, if possible, to be even more insulting to women than usual. In response to the frankly unnecessary question "Bush or Bare?", approximately 80% indicated a preference for a hairfree cunt, while a handful more said they liked a landing strip. One bachelor was undecided while only one preferred what he called a "trimmed hedge".

That CLEO posed the question in the first place only reinforced the idea it is right and even necessary for women to consider how the state of their pubic hair might be influential in attracting a mate. That Australia's supposedly most eligible (and available) men might consider pubic hair a deal breaker is only further evidence of how much women's bodies have become captive to social mores that place their own enjoyment of and engagement with sexuality distinctly on the periphery to the more important question of how that sexuality can be used to satisfy male desire.

"It's disturbing that the porn aesthetic has become so normalised", says Emily Maguire. "I do think that the more women are seen as equal, generally the less willing men will be to see us as objects rather than active subjects."

The issue is one close to Maguire's heart. The Sydney based writer has just released her first non-fiction book, Princesses & Pornstars: Sex. Power, Identity, a work that is at turns anecdotal, funny, heartbreaking and above all razor sharp. Described as a "call to arms", Maguire wrote the book "for young-ish women (and men), many of whom I suspect feel discomfort around a lot of the things I talk about but perhaps can't articulate what's bothering them."

And there is a lot to be bothered by. Maguire expertly traverses the gamut of problematic gender disparity facing women and men today, from the well worn practise of "slut" shaming to the constructed notion of female sexual modesty; from the continued insistence of society to attribute motherhood as a woman's natural (and most fulfilling) role to the overwhelming presence of misogyny in porn.

Among the gendered expectations Maguire argues against are the limited ways in which female sexuality is allowed to express itself. "Most people will go through several phases in their sexual lives...The 'slut', the 'virgin', the 'girl gone wild' and the sexually conservative mother of three are all likely to be the same person."

Yet we still find ourselves operating within a dichotomy of the Girl Gone Either Mild Or Wild. We can be the Princess (delicate and in need of protection) or the Slut (whose sexual promiscuity is no doubt due to both her crushingly low self esteem and her inability to make decisions for herself).

Equally true is that society continues to falsely claim natural biological inclinations regarding male and female sexuality. For example, teenage boys have long been the recipients of sitcom fathers' animosity, being "only after one thing". Meanwhile, teenage girls are told their vagina is something they must guard from men lest it be tampered with and ultimately devalued through over use.

"A vagina is not a car", Maguire snorts derisively. "I believe [slut shaming] seriously harms girls and young women by making them ashamed of what they naturally feel. That boys are encouraged to experiment and masturbate and be embarassed and be alive to their urges is excellent. I want this for girls. Fun, shame-free, safe."

The sexual desires and rampant curiosity of teenage girls are rarely, if ever acknowledged. Instead, we read panic stories about sex education and contraceptive access, sounding the alarm that the availability of such things can only lead to female promiscuity. Even the Australian Medical Association is guilty of such dismissal, claiming earlier this month that it was less important for high schools to provide teenage girls with the Morning After Pill than it was for them to provide comprehensive sex education.

Why, the rational person must ask themselves, can't there be both?

This odd conservatism continues into adulthood, with women succumbing to restrictive sexual moulds that enhance enjoyment not through physical experience but through the understanding that inhabiting them confirms their attractiveness in the eyes of their partner. The sexually attractive woman is compliant, available and in denial of almost everything that grows naturally on her body - yet that same woman is not supposed to pursue sex vigorously, enjoy sex unashamedly or exude sexuality in any way other than those prescribed to her as socially acceptable.

Maguire agrees. "Women have been convinced that being sexual objects is okay, because men like it and men liking you is good and it means you're a proper woman. But being a sexual being in and of and for yourself is shameful. It's why women never talk about masturbation - having sex to show your love or admiration for a man is okay, but having sex (with yourself) because you had the urge is shameful. "

This Stepfordism is frightening enough when applied insidiously. Knowing it's exaggerated in modern porn is downright terrifying given that's where most young men glean their first sexual experiences. Mainstream porn today is overwhelmingly male centric, with the degradation and humiliation of the women involved seemingly the norm. Maguire's commentary on the porn industry reveals some disturbing attitudes amongst otherwise sociable young men of her acquaintance.

"I've heard men justify their porn watching by arguing that 'it's just a fantasy - I wouldn't treat a woman like that in real life'. But someone did treat a woman like that in real life to create the image. That stuff really happened; that's the point."

If men are learning to view sex as something that happens TO women rather than WITH them, what hope have we got?

"I think we really have come a long way in the last fifty years or so, but the history of the world is one of women's oppression and so there's millennia of sexism to overcome, not just decades," laments Maguire. "As tough as it can be, we need to keep on keeping on...We need to cut off the misogyny poisoning at a younger age and hope that this minimises the damage."

Princesses & Pornstars: Sex, Power, Identity is available now through Text Publishing for $32.95.

------------

Hope everyone enjoyed the ridiculously long holiday that was Easter. I for one am glad it's over. Next weekend I jet to Melbourne to swan about with my lovely Mata Hari and moon over all the visiting comedians from overseas. The week after that, I'm going to Sydney to indulge in my musical theatre obsession and shape the young female minds of my awesome cousins.

Peace out (and congratulations to The Big Issue for achieving such a milestone!)






8 apples:

PetStarr said...

Great article, really enjoyed that on my first day back at le office.

You're going to Melbourne??? watch out!!!! You know why.

franzy said...

See, you reeled me in with this one:

"Even the Australian Medical Association is guilty of such dismissal, claiming earlier this month that it was less important for high schools to provide teenage girls with the Morning After Pill than it was for them to provide comprehensive sex education."

Aren't they both important? I thought. Audrey seems to be barking at the wrong dog here. Then:

"Why, the rational person must ask themselves, can't there be both?"

And she pulls us right back in! Nice work. Nice, nice work.

I reveal here and now that I am digitally cutting out and keeping this article in my clippings file for my next book.

Jacob said...

Don't really share your sense of outrage, Audrey. If a woman said that she didn't like the way her boyfriend's pubes looked, I'm sure most would do something about it.

audrey said...

Do you think he would be quite happy to trot along and have everything torn out? Can you envisage a world where it was just expected that men removed their pubic hair in its entirety? I'm not opposed to a spot of grooming. Everyone likes a neat back and sides - I just think the idea of brazilian waxes is fairly ridiculous. I think the expectation that it's 'just what women do now' is pretty pathetic. Not that that's what you're suggesting SHOULD be the case - but I think there's an awful lot of difference between wanting someone to have a much needed tidy up and expecting that they remove it all because it's just not very attractive.

And personally, I find bare vaginas pretty off putting. Vaginas need a hat.

blue milk said...

Great review. I really value the points you've highlighted from Maguire's book. I think these are such important Have you read Female Chauvenist Pig? I'm almost certain you will have... if so, where does this book go that differs from or builds on the messages in Levy's book? What does it add, in addition to an Australian POV?

Many thanks in anticipation.

blue milk said...

Whoops, deleted part of my previous comment, and not even sure what I had originally written.. it's just that you have me very excited about feminism after reading your review.

audrey said...

Bluemilk, while Emily draws on Female Chauvinist Pigs in discussion this is definitely not a recreation at all. In fact, she includes some really interesting analysis of the panic surrounding so called raunch culture and how it can go too far and end up denying any kind of overt expression of female sexuality as being valid or powerful. While Levy covered the basics of sex and culture, Emily talks about a wide range of issues only some of which I was able to discuss in the review. There's an excellent chapter on the supposed crisis of boys in schools, and she discusses in great detail the idea that genders are genetically programmed into certain behaviour when the truth of the matter is that most of this is learned. I would say it's actually better than FCP - that one should read FCP first, but then turn to Princesses and Pornstars for a more complete look at feminism and the status of women in Australia today.

Seriously, get thee to a bookstore now!

melt said...

Thanks for a great review: book was on the vague list, now moved up to definite.

Re sex education & morning after pill - I agree, both are important and both should be readily available. But I also agree with the AMA that sex ed is the most important. The morning after pill does nothing to stop STDs, some of which rob women of future fertility choices and some of which can kill. As a Dr working with young people, I'm very aware that there is little recognition that these diseases are real & around in our community. Nor are many young women (or men) aware of the variety of contraceptive options available.

Sex education empowers teens to choose for themselves. Most, when given their options, choose to prepare ahead & consider their lives & health first - and keep the morning-after pill where it should be: as a back-up.

Post a Comment