Monday, July 23, 2007

Rightwing checklist for letters you may want to send into The Age

My mother chose me over the alternative [emotive headline - check]

I AM not supposed to have an opinion on abortion that counts [passive-aggression - check], because I'm male and a Christian [inbuilt superiority complex - check], but when my mum tells me that I was unexpected and unplanned, it all starts to have a familiar sound to it. [world weary cynicism over degrading morals - check]

I'm the youngest of seven (two didn't survive beyond childhood) [intimation of sacred fragility of human life - check] and the only one born here after my parents migrated from Germany.

My mum has found Australia difficult from day one and I'm thankful she did not consider me inconvenient [heartfelt thanks given for opportunity to live - check] when she found out I was going to arrive after less than a year here [suggestion of moral triumph in the face of a potential burden - check].

I can only shudder at members of the Victorian Government proposing a law that harks back to 1930s German government policies [thinly veiled accusation of evil - check] that effectively removed equal rights [suggestion of fascism - check] to other human beings [line in the sand, there are no such things as foetuses only human beings - check].

If laws such as this existed here 40 years ago [sophisticated subconcious hint that such laws are backwards and medieval - check], it would have put developing humans such as myself [reminder that one knows what one is talking about because one has experienced it - check] at risk simply at the whim [disparagement of 'fanciful' notions like children being a rational impossibility - check] of another human being [judgement of those who've had abortions - check].

I would not have been worthy of equal protection ['where are my civil liberties?' - check] simply because of my total dependence on my mother for a few months [reminder that babies are god's helpless children and in need of protection - check].

My mum knows this kind of philosophy only too well [symbolise struggle against the odds - check].

If I had been aborted, I would not exist [include easily rebuttable but superficially emotive throwaway line about the value of the life you would not know had you been aborted - check].

It's not the mark of a mature human society to remove innate rights, regardless of any other argument that can be built to support such a motion [bring forth moral judgement designed to make practitioners of offensive action hang heads in shame - check].

Germany was a technologically progressive nation back then, but still managed to miss some fundamentals [subtle reminder of specific evil dictators and how they were lacking in humanity and do you want to be the same? - check].

Equal rights means just that, and if some class is somehow excluded, the whole concept is seriously undermined [reminder to the civil libertarians of the poor, defenceless babies they choose to ignore in pursuit of their 'cause' - check].

In fact, if abortion is decriminalised [introduce visions of anarchy, moral decay and loss of soul - check] — effectively the denial of the right to live — equal rights is a myth and a delusion [sneakily argue the philisophocal ramifications for the diehards - check].

And I seriously doubt that the experience will be any different or better for women [demonstrate complete lack of understanding about what pregnancy must be like for some women, and how having something as simple as the law on their side makes a truckload of difference to women struggling the world over, making sure that every syllable of your disregard for their opinion is dripping with superior white christian male arrogance while being completely devoid of evidenciary support, facts or context - check].


Mark Rabich, Mount Evelyn [wanker - check]


Peace out (check)

16 apples:

mskp said...

this is another parlour game we play in our house - it's called "return to sender". spot the letter-writer who accidentally mailed their missive to the age instead of the herald sun [upon receipt of which the age publishes irrespective of merit in order to avoid charges of bias a la aunty's climate change swindle].

this guy is a definite return to sender.

P.S. IS IT WRONG THAT I AM FIGHTING THE URGE TO MAKE A VERY SICK JOKE ABOUT HIM BEING A GOOD ADVERTISEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE CHANGE?

Eleanor Bloom said...

I note that he's written to The Age before... against same-sex marriages - surprise, surprise. So when he says:

"Equal rights means just that, and if some class is somehow excluded, the whole concept is seriously undermined"

...what does he mean exactly? Equal rights for white, male, creationists?

Edward Yates said...

Yes it would be wrong mskp. But funny because it is wrong.

This guy does not get it.

People are killed all the time.

The question is can we kill the baby/feotus/it?

The answer is yes. The same as euthanasia to prevent suffering means that it is actually moral to kill.

I used to argue about definitions at what stage it is to be considered human or not (bun in oven 3 months or bun out of oven etc etc etc.)

Now I see the real question as being can we kill it? Compared to potentially destroying a woman's life (emotional, financial, psychological, social). And if not actual. Thousands of women sought abortions before it was deemed legal under certain circumstances and fucking died. I would say yes we can kill it morally.

I'm a Victorian and a male/man and I support any changes to make abortion accessible and easier for all. I doubt I'll get media coverage though.

Hope you are good.

Ed

Penni said...

I too am glad his mother didn't terminate that pregnancy. Not so Mark Whatsit would live to write another bigoted misinformed letter to the Age but because forty years ago she could have suffered serious health consequences (including death) as a result of a procedure performed by an unregulated backyard abortionist.

I can't say 'gosh, imagine if I'd never been born. Me. Me!' is a very compelling argument against abortion. The image of an alternative universe without him in it doesn't exactly fill me with cold-blooded terror.

Ms Batville said...

Oh yes - check, check, check, check. Great post.

Nai said...

Great post, great comments. The 'I could have been aborted, so I'm against reproductive rights' ploy annoys me greatly because it relies on trapping anyone arguing against it into implying that the person should have been aborted. And be that as it may, you are hardly likely to get anywhere in a discussion when you have implied (in their own poor, simple minds) that they should be dead.
For everyone of those who uses this tired old tag are others who were also unplanned/badly timed/whatever (like me) who stand up for the right of a potential mother to decide if she is capable and prepared at the time of pregnancy to raise a child, and to abort the foetus if she is not. Everyone of us 'could' have been aborted, all potential mother's need to make the right decision for themselves and by extension for the foetus. Personally I am thrilled that Ma had me, and that she never had any doubt that she would 'keep' me. But she did not do anything that renders her anymore decent by making the decision that she could raise me than a woman who makes the equally tough decision to not continue a pregnancy. And I know that Ma would never see herself as morally superior to a woman who decided to abort a feotus rather than bring a baby into the world against their own needs and judgement. Surely child neglect, abuse and general disinterestedness on the part of parents who are legally coerced or forced into continuing with a pregnancy is a greater crime than aboting an as yet unsentient being?

Sakura said...

What a knob head, that's all I can really say about this man a complete knob head.

bec said...

I think the time is nothing
If not nigh
To let the truth out
Coolest f-word ever deserves a fucking shout!
I mean
Why can't all decent men and women
Call themselves feminists?

Ani.

susanna said...

harrgh! what a wanker! it makes me sick when people like him play the "i'm the victim, you're the fascist" card to make a case for circumscribing the rights of others.

gigglewick said...

What I find breathtaking is the RTL's inability to understand that abortion happens NOW.

By not voting the Bill in the vic Parliament (not government, because it's a private members bill which should be supported by people from ALL parties) is saying that EIGHTY PER CENT OF THE COMMUNITY IS WRONG TO THINK THAT ABORTION SHOULD BE SAFE AND ACCESSIBLE.

Sorry, I've already had this rant over at mine, but it makes me very very cross.

audrey said...

Basically, all I can say is that he's a nob of the highest degree. I hate these letters more than anything, because they're quite well articulated which tricks people into thinking they're smart.

And that would be an excellent point Eleanor, if we didn't all know that the gays are obviously evil and therefore undeserving of equal rights. You know. Like people who's names start with M and end with Ohammed.

blue milk said...

Terrific post.

RTLers like this one are quite wrong to suggest they view these 'lives' equally - the woman's and the foetus/future person's. If you force women to continue pregnancies against their will you are simply favouring one 'life' over another. Women don't pursue abortions for nothing. If completing the pregnancy threatened the life of the mother through some health aspect would they still advocate abortion? If not then they have arguably chosen one life's value over another and if so then they have most certainly chosen one life over another. And as soon as you say in some instances one life is more important than another's, the woman's over the potential person's then you have crossed the line. As a RTLer the only difference you then have with the choice movement is that you don't trust women to make that decision for and about themselves, you somehow think you can make a better decision about their life better than that woman with all her expertise on her own life and circumstances. You are arrogant.

I don't know why these people fear the concept of abortion on demand so much either - everyone puts off going to the dentist, what makes them think that women are going to be casually running off to a clinic all the time to have things put up their vagina. (RU486 is not readily avail). Its still an invasive procedure and women don't take that lightly. Decriminalising will just mean that the procedure is treated legally the way it is treated in practice.

Anonymous said...

Trackback


Cast iron Balcony

Darlene said...

I read one of those, "I am so lucky my mum chose to give me a life" letters the other day.

Yep, they are so standard one would think they come out of a pollie's office.

Susanne said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Susanne said...

Ugh.

Where to start?

He's certainly given us a great example of why male Christians such as himself should keep their opinions to themselves.

Offhandedly declaring the trauma of an unplanned pregnancy as a tad 'incovenient' trivialises the issue. As does the idea that one might have an abortion on a 'whim'.

How did the mother manage to cope with a brood of seven in a brand-new country anyway?? I'd like to hear from her

Post a Comment